2 ms·
I'm not saying we shouldn't try. Each individual person willing to help should do so. I'm saying more broadly that we're all probably at the mercy of an inesca
by sp527 9y ago
I'm not saying we shouldn't try. Each individual person willing to help should do so.
I'm saying more broadly that we're all probably at the mercy of an inescapable cycle that may not end until humanity is willing to cooperate perfectly at the global/species level of abstraction.
'The Lessons of History' also comments that competition is also inherent to our biological nature. There's a passage about how we usually only cooperate in order to compete at plural granularities (e.g. families, corporations, nations, religions). This has obvious implications for the tradeoff between freedom and equality.
- lovich 9y agoI agree that there is a trade-off between freedom and equality but the better our technology gets the better we can draw that line. We already have decided that both extremes aren't good so you can't for instance buy someone just because you are rich, and if you become successful we don't take all of your money until you are back to the national average. We have to try and figure out what a good balance is otherwise you are just going to capitulate to whichever group pushes their viewpoint through