4 ms·
Ironically, that's kinda what happened to BeOS--the assets were bought by Palm, right around the time Palm was splitting into two companies. PalmSource, the OS
by chipotle_coyote 9y ago
Ironically, that's kinda what happened to BeOS--the assets were bought by Palm, right around the time Palm was splitting into two companies. PalmSource, the OS company, developed "Palm OS Cobalt," which was intended to be the next-generation Palm operating system, built on BeOS. While they completed Cobalt, the now-separate Palm hardware company didn't use it.
Also, according to Jean-Louis Gassée, an Apple engineer tried to buy BeOS from Palm for the then-unnamed smartphone project, as a third candidate between Fadell's vision of a souped-up Pixo--the iPod OS--and Forstall's vision of a cut-down OS X. Palm turned the engineer down. (Gassée didn't name the engineer, but it's hard not to suspect it was Dominic Giampaolo, who created BeFS and went on to create Apple's Spotlight and then, unsurprisingly, work on APFS.)
- Apocryphon 9y agoCould they do the same to HaikuOS?
- chipotle_coyote 9y agoWhile I'm rooting for Haiku in the abstract, they've been working for going on 17 years now without hitting beta. I don't have a lot of confidence that it's ever going to get past the "fascinating curiosity" stage. (I know some people would argue that BeOS itself never got past that point, but I ran it full-time for all of 1999 with very little difficulty--it had a surprisingly robust software scene given its size.) At any rate, I suspect if you were looking for the foundation for a new mobile OS today, there would be better choices.
- Apocryphon 9y agoWhat better choices would you suggest?