> I think these comparisons are silly because they are trying to find some blanket universal rule. Says who? The author goes into detail about what exactly the

> I think these comparisons are silly because they are trying to find some blanket universal rule. Says who? The author goes into detail about what exactly they were measuring. The last two headings are "When Flat Designs Can Work" and "Limitations of the Study." Can you clarify exactly what you found "significantly flawed"? I don't get what you're trying to say by your wikipedia link. > What works most of the time might not work in your specific case. So what? Is it not worth knowing what works most of the time and under what assumptions?