Every time one of these armchair lawyer articles is posted it stirs up a bunch of fretting about nothing. These are the legal requirements of a TOS that lets Tw

Every time one of these armchair lawyer articles is posted it stirs up a bunch of fretting about nothing. These are the legal requirements of a TOS that lets Twitter (or Google, or Facebook, or...) handle things like uploading images, creating thumbnails (including changing aspect ratio) and distributing the result to users, without a photographer suing them for copyright infringement. Don't like that it's overly broad? Your problem is with copyright lawyers, not with Twitter.