4 ms·
It can't be "on chip": data has to get in and out somehow. It's "quite possible" to do a lot of things if you don't intend to actually do any of them.
by 0xbear 9y ago
It can't be "on chip": data has to get in and out somehow.
It's "quite possible" to do a lot of things if you don't intend to actually do any of them.
- deepnotderp 9y ago1. Errr what? You mean the input data? Sure, but that isn't usually considered the power consumption. Otherwise you can totally have most of the data (in the sense where data is the weights and activation maps) reside on chip. That's the only way to get high power efficiency. 2. Well, only time can tell there :)