3 ms·
One would hope that we could draw the appropriate logarithmic taxation curve to constrain risky investment without eliminating it outright. I personally do not
by existencebox 9y ago
One would hope that we could draw the appropriate logarithmic taxation curve to constrain risky investment without eliminating it outright. I personally do not see a massive problem with curtailing some of the power/amount of money flowing around in some of these entities; but don't see it as an all or nothing as you suggest.
I'd note however that my original point was to emphasize the smallness of most of the initial investments. One does not need to be a billion dollar entity to have enough diversification in high risk investments to make it a worthwhile component of your portfolio.
(I'd also defend America's ingenuity prior to the advent of VC; we were a pioneer in the sciences and technology long before venture capital was a thing. This is an entirely separate discussion about the viability of various forms of tech. growth stimulus that I'm neither qualified nor desirous to have, but I mention it to suggest that if we've found success in other systems before, there may be reason to experiment further when we observe a clearly deleterious trend in the current state.)
- aswanson 9y agoIm not completely dismissing your argument; I agree with you that something has to be done with unprecedented inequality. Also, Im not suggesting that is an all-or-nothing dichotomy, Im asking you to think of the investor behavioural consequences of that type of tax policy. We of course can never know what those investors would have done given those circumstances, but its important to try to understand what the possibly nonlinear effects would be.
- aswanson 9y agoAlso, if you could, would you direct me to the sources of some of your readings of history so I can better understand the perspective you presented, especially regarding the 70s and 80s.