3 ms·
Good points and I'm not arguing them. Things are now extremely more convenient then they were. What's missing is differences in approach to solving, well, every
by Keyframe 9y ago
Good points and I'm not arguing them. Things are now extremely more convenient then they were. What's missing is differences in approach to solving, well, everything. Everything was different from system to system (esp. mid 80's to mid 90's). People were still figuring out what to settle on. From a perspective of someone who likes to tinker with stuff, it was a blast. From a business and maybe usability perspective - it was a nightmare.
Now, when most stuff is settled-upon, it's like cars. There are differences, but not really. Turn lights to your left, wipers to your right, wheel turns left and right, there's a manual stick or automatic, pedals... it's all there, where you expect them to be. And that's good! Times were a bit more pioneering back then, naturally.
- iso-8859-1 9y agoThe industry has grown. Linux was niche in 1992. E.g. Genode is niche today. UNIX beards don't see the pioneering because they just want UNIX. Sounds like you can't see the wood for the trees. :P
- Keyframe 9y agoMaybe! :) But, when I try to look at it objectively, as far as I can, I can see there aren't any big paradigm shifts / explorations in OS' and computer architectures anymore. With a reason, industry has matured and moved from tectonic shifts to iteration.