Well the clique here seems to be all in when they have no direct loss in such an assertion but the companies recently in the news with union concerns are/were a

Well the clique here seems to be all in when they have no direct loss in such an assertion but the companies recently in the news with union concerns are/were all darlings here at one time or another. Yet their leadership which qualifies under your statement objects to the idea of a union operating over their employees. no one wants added cost or loss of control in their company and I am sure many in leadership positions think they are doing far more than is perceived by the line workers. in the US unions earned their bad reputation but are a very strong political force at the state level because of public employee unions. we have sufficient laws to protect workers in any industry these days but it was not the case fifty or a hundred years ago. today's unions are more about the political power they can wield than the workers they protect.