3 ms·
> Hmm. When you say "talks to the LCD directly", there's still a tiny low-level controller attached to the LCD, right? There's a chip on the FPCB bonded to the
by new299 9y ago
> Hmm. When you say "talks to the LCD directly", there's still a tiny low-level controller attached to the LCD, right?
There's a chip on the FPCB bonded to the LCD matrix.
> While highly nonstandard, but I want to see how feasible it is to truly drive an LCD directly.
I guess you'd probably need to use an FPGA to do that. I can't see an advantage to doing this (there might be one, but I can't see it).
- exikyut 9y agoWoops, didn't see reply. I was curious about integrating LCD control into a single processor because the security implications are really interesting. Just an idea at this point though. I remember looking inside cheap electronic organizers and seeing a lone blob on the PCB. So I know managing simple LCDs is doable.