3 ms·
> Since 'fuck' can be interpreted in a sexual context Agreed. I think he could've simply dropped the u in just the domain name - fcknazis.us - and used f*cknaz
by justboxing 9y ago
> Since 'fuck' can be interpreted in a sexual context
Agreed. I think he could've simply dropped the u in just the domain name - fcknazis.us - and used f*cknazis in the logo / branding on home page. Or done a play on the word like fcuknazis.us (also just for the domain name :)
Then he might have a stronger case for arguing that fck or fcuk is not sexual.
- jlrubin 9y agoYou should familiarize yourself with the Miller Test[0] that I cite in the post. Even if it is expressly sexual (e.g., I literally made a degrading pornographic film of Nazis having sex) it would still have an exceedingly strong case under the third prong of the Miller Test. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miller_test https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miller_test
- gfodor 9y agoYou assume that the content of the site is relevant. Do you know this? If not, it's just as likely (from an outside observers pov) the domain is using 'fuck' as a euphemism for 'have sex with' as it is the one you intended. In the case where the purpose of the domain is irrelevant and the registration of the domain itself (and its publication to DNS) is the speech in question my armchair assessment is this may actually be untrodden ground.