3 ms·
The first article points out the inefficiency and does a good job of replicating some basic functionality. It's basically saying "with this starting pointing, t
by alex_g 9y ago
The first article points out the inefficiency and does a good job of replicating some basic functionality. It's basically saying "with this starting pointing, the performance is not as good, but we could probably make it a lot better without spending $86 mil"
IMO, this one is saying "I'm gonna push the starting point even further back and complain about someone making a suggestion about inefficiencies."
But that's the internet I guess.
- fywikyj 9y agohttp://bit.ly/2urhLeM http://bit.ly/2urhLeM
- sverige 9y agoA little digging seems to indicate that the author makes a living as an engineer whose livelihood relies on customers paying for solutions provided by the company he works for, so naturally it is offensive that someone would criticize inflated costs associated with a third-party, closed source solution to a problem.