3 ms·
Why downvote this comment? Genuinely curious. The article poorly is written and makes all sorts of potentially offensive assumptions. Why have it on the front p
by JacksonGariety 9y ago
Why downvote this comment? Genuinely curious. The article poorly is written and makes all sorts of potentially offensive assumptions. Why have it on the front page?
- alansammarone 9y agoI don't think a scientific study loses any merit if it doesn't make people reading it happier.
- coldtea 9y ago>Why downvote this comment? Genuinely curious. Because it raised a complaint that had nothing to do with the article. That's an article describing the results from a study on self-reported happiness level through people's lives from 1.3 million sample respondents. The question about "misfortune" is a non sequitur -- out of the scope of the study, and irrelevant to it. Those 1.3 million random samples will still have the same distribution of misfortunes as the general population in their countries. Second, because it didn't seem to differentiate between a journalist reporting on the results of a survey, and those that did the survey. Third, because I don't find the article poorly written, and I don't particularly care whether someone "flagged" it or not -- reminded me of those who bring up "cancelling their subscription" in their letters to the editor.