3 ms·

Really none of these should be called porn+. They are various forms of abuse imagery and are both crimes and evidence of crimes. + (Assuming the rape and viole

Really none of these should be called porn+. They are various forms of abuse imagery and are both crimes and evidence of crimes. + (Assuming the rape and violence are real not just actors)

jessaustin 9y ago
In a few years lots of the edgier stuff will just be very realistic computer-generated imagery, but I expect the puritans will be making the same argument? In fact, even if the government set up some sort of bureau of approved CP (maybe they would enforce that all legal CP could be built from source?) lots of people would still want it outlawed...
- alsetmusic 9y ago
  > In a few years lots of the edgier stuff will just be very realistic computer-generated imagery, but I expect the puritans will be making the same argument? In fact, even if the government set up some sort of bureau of approved CP (maybe they would enforce that all legal CP could be built from source?) lots of people would still want it outlawed... I lack a citation, but I believe even mock child porn is already illegal in the US.
- snakeanus 9y ago
  Countries like the UK and Canada already consider drawn pornography of characters that look underage illegal. Most Japanese anime and manga pornography (even extremely unrealistic hand-drawn instances of it) is already illegal in these countries, see http://www.gazettelive.co.uk/news/teesside-news/anime-fan-convicted-over-illegal-7958896 http://www.gazettelive.co.uk/news/teesside-news/anime-fan-co... for example.
  - deleted 9y ago
    [deleted]
  - etplayer 9y ago
    Not only the UK an Canada, but Australia, NZ and some European countries too have implemented what I must say is a heinous law against freedom of expression through drawing. This hideous trend shows that governments have little care. It was also illegal in all of the US at the country level, however this was stricken down by SCOTUS rightly in my judgement as a violation of the first amendment. There are still state laws against it.
khedoros1 9y ago
> They are various forms of abuse imagery and are both crimes and evidence of crimes. They can be that and still be porn to some people.

Really none of these should be called porn+. They are various forms of abuse imagery and are both crimes and evidence of crimes. + (Assuming the rape and violence are real not just actors)

jessaustin 9y ago

In a few years lots of the edgier stuff will just be very realistic computer-generated imagery, but I expect the puritans will be making the same argument? In fact, even if the government set up some sort of bureau of approved CP (maybe they would enforce that all legal CP could be built from source?) lots of people would still want it outlawed...

alsetmusic 9y ago
> In a few years lots of the edgier stuff will just be very realistic computer-generated imagery, but I expect the puritans will be making the same argument? In fact, even if the government set up some sort of bureau of approved CP (maybe they would enforce that all legal CP could be built from source?) lots of people would still want it outlawed... I lack a citation, but I believe even mock child porn is already illegal in the US.
snakeanus 9y ago
Countries like the UK and Canada already consider drawn pornography of characters that look underage illegal. Most Japanese anime and manga pornography (even extremely unrealistic hand-drawn instances of it) is already illegal in these countries, see http://www.gazettelive.co.uk/news/teesside-news/anime-fan-convicted-over-illegal-7958896 http://www.gazettelive.co.uk/news/teesside-news/anime-fan-co... for example.
- deleted 9y ago
  [deleted]
- etplayer 9y ago
  Not only the UK an Canada, but Australia, NZ and some European countries too have implemented what I must say is a heinous law against freedom of expression through drawing. This hideous trend shows that governments have little care. It was also illegal in all of the US at the country level, however this was stricken down by SCOTUS rightly in my judgement as a violation of the first amendment. There are still state laws against it.

khedoros1 9y ago

> They are various forms of abuse imagery and are both crimes and evidence of crimes. They can be that and still be porn to some people.