4 ms·
You're still not responding to the core of my issue here, so I don't see a point in continuing this discussion. I can respond to each and every point about audi
by ivraatiems 9y ago
You're still not responding to the core of my issue here, so I don't see a point in continuing this discussion. I can respond to each and every point about audio quality, convenience, etc, etc, etc, but the real point - I'm not supporting Apple doing something I didn't ask for in order to achieve something I don't want for money I don't care to spend, and that should be an acceptable thing - gets lost if I do.
- scarface74 9y agoYou're still not responding to the core of my issue here, so I don't see a point in continuing this discussion. I can respond to each and every point about audio quality, convenience, etc, etc, etc, but the real point - I'm not supporting Apple doing something I didn't ask for in order to achieve something I don't want for money I don't care to spend, and that should be an acceptable thing - gets lost if I do. If you expect Apple to keep legacy interfaces when there are technically better alternatives, you haven't been following Apple for long. Apple dropped 32 bit support for Macs back in 2008. Windows still has 32 bit support. They are dropping 32 bit support for iOS this year. If Apple sees that there is a better technical solution, they are the first to drop an outdated one. The headphone jack is inferior in every way to the alternatives. If you argued that Apple should drop lightning and support USB-C as the one port solution for iPhones, I wouldn't argue with you. But holding on to headphone jacks is like people holding on to the floppy disk and Mac users complaining about dropping ADB ports and before that they"Apple II forever" crowd.