4 ms·
OK, I'll admit I didn't get that far. But that means the method was accurate ±8mm? Still not ±4mm... (Unless I don't understand the ± notation)
by Spare_account 9y ago
OK, I'll admit I didn't get that far.
But that means the method was accurate ±8mm?
Still not ±4mm...
(Unless I don't understand the ± notation)
- maxerickson 9y ago1 face probably isn't enough to characterize the accuracy of the method.
- Spare_account 9y agoWell that kind of invalidates the entire article then! ;-)