4 ms·
>Every time a major advance is made in AI the computational neuroscientist say: "why didn't you talk to us 15 years ago? We could have told you that!" Can you
by moultano 9y ago
>Every time a major advance is made in AI the computational neuroscientist say: "why didn't you talk to us 15 years ago? We could have told you that!"
Can you name one time that has happened? I can't think of any.
- dragandj 9y agoHindsight is 20/20 there.
- eli_gottlieb 9y agoBayesian brain theories of perception. The neuroscientists and cognitive scientists are still waiting for the AI theorists to stop obsessing over that one paper with the cat's visual cortex and get off the deep learning train of sacrificing correctness for cheapness to compute.
- return0 9y agothis is not a case that happened
- eli_gottlieb 9y agoAs a matter of fact, the mainstream AI community hasn't adopted probabilistic programming, but it does exist.
- aoeuasdf1 9y agoFeel free to link to any Kaggle blog posts showing victories using probabilistic programming. Is your opinion independent of evidence?
- return0 9y agoyou re going way off topic . this is about AI discoveries which in retrospect were found to have been discovered by neuroscience. you 're complaining that a potential theory (which is only partially supported by evidence) might one day hypothetically be found useful in AI.