Whether a person's guilt has been proven beyond reasonable doubt is a question of fact for the judge or jury deciding a particular case, and not something that

Whether a person's guilt has been proven beyond reasonable doubt is a question of fact for the judge or jury deciding a particular case, and not something that can be determined by precedent. But given that people are regularly convicted of historical sex offences based solely on the credible testimony of the victim, it is difficult to imagine that a judge or jury would find a person not guilty of possessing a particular file solely on the basis of the pigeonhole principle.