3 ms·

So let's see: * Accepting the investments and actually delivering what's promised. Massive risk from organizing/coordinating an actual team, pissing off author

So let's see: * Accepting the investments and actually delivering what's promised. Massive risk from organizing/coordinating an actual team, pissing off authorities, huge contact surface with many involved people that will happily help FBI trace the founders. * Running away with the money. Low risk, low contact surface (website + bitcoin, similar to WannaCry?), 100% anonymous. Nobody will run to the police claiming that they have invested into something illegal and looked down upon lured in by a 200% ROI promise and now want they money back. Stepping into the founders' shoes, I'd say it's much riskier to NOT run away with the money...

the_stc 9y ago
We already have a core team, and 2 other trustworthy, known, not-first-time, people to bring on. The rest will be hired in a fully trustless fashion. Unlike other ICOs[1], we're offering shares with dividends. Plus, we have an actual, real, business model that can generate significant profits. 1: I hate the term ICO for what we're doing, but calling it an IPO generated confusion. We're quick to distinguish the difference, though.