I was under the assumption that the $100 price included the prices of imports. At some point the analogy breaks down, since importing people isn't the same thi

I was under the assumption that the $100 price included the prices of imports. At some point the analogy breaks down, since importing people isn't the same thing as importing things. The points were that these kinds of pricing shifts can and have happened before, reactions can be varied, and reactions usually affect things on the demand (i.e., employer) side of the equation.