4 ms·
> when the person is underage This feels like post-hoc reasoning, given that the parents are involved, and that the person can also stop, transfer, whatever on
by vacri 9y ago
> when the person is underage
This feels like post-hoc reasoning, given that the parents are involved, and that the person can also stop, transfer, whatever on their own later on.
> while they were still a child
Referring to 17-year-olds as 'children' is simply being disingenuous. You can join the army at 17.
- dragonwriter 9y ago> Referring to 17-year-olds as 'children' is simply being disingenuous. You can join the army at 17. The second statement in no way supports the first.