Let's say the customers, that you sold your produce to, know that you sell at your farm: the YouTube channel. You may be willing to toil the earth at new locat

Let's say the customers, that you sold your produce to, know that you sell at your farm: the YouTube channel. You may be willing to toil the earth at new location, but not having those same customers who want to buy from you at new location, is the biggest loss, more so than the land. The land owner, didn't mind what you were doing, it's even legal what you were doing, but then one fine day the landowner dated a girl who didn't like that you cultivated onions, she hates onions, she convinced the landowner to get rid of you. And the landowner owns 70% of the land in your country and 90% of the produce buyers are also residing on the same lands. Going to new land is much much unfair proposition. At these scales the legal system, which still exists and has power, should step in an break apart the land owner or impose rules which forces him to play fair. Anti-trust laws exist for this very reason. Break up Google.