3 ms·

Yep, exactly. We're dealing with personal services workers, and in the higher-range, these are not interchangeable. If a client finds a provider and they really

Yep, exactly. We're dealing with personal services workers, and in the higher-range, these are not interchangeable. If a client finds a provider and they really mesh, then it's likely they'll directly contact. We'll deal with this by offering very reduced fees for those kinds of repeats. We're also working to expand our services so we still provide value even in such a case, but that can be hard. A lot of the value we provide is up-front. We verified the providers so we know they perform services and are not LE. We will have verified health status periodically. So if you find someone using our system, that alone is a big endorsement right there. There are multi-million-dollar businesses that only handle that part (and only handle it to a lesser extent). In the not-high-end range, I think scheduling alone is enough to justify using us. It's annoying to have to message a couple people and wait for their responses versus just having it all automatically booked. Security, too. Plus people are more likely to want to try something new and different.

Canada 9y ago
So, you're going to recruit girls, "try them out", take their pictures, get test STD results, provide physical security for them, verify the identities of their clients, collect payment, provide insurance, and publish an Android app to promote this? And you're going to do it all through Tor because, of course, you need to be anonymous? That is very convenient considering that you're doing a token sale! I have to say, if I were totally anonymous and my ICO went well I'd probably renege on the whole thing. After all, why would I put myself in serious legal jeopardy by running a form of darknet market when I could just pocket the investors money secure in the knowledge that nobody will feel sorry for them?
- the_stc 9y ago
  Almost: At first the app will be a PWA so that users can use iOS. But yes, the provider side will eventually end up as Android-only app. These are not really tokens, they are dividend-generating shares that will optionally be recorded via ERC20 tokens. We are using the term ICO only because saying IPO or Blockchain IPO tended to confuse people. We want to raise secondary rounds to really expand, and screwing Series A investors sounds like the worst way to achieve that goal.

Canada 9y ago

So, you're going to recruit girls, "try them out", take their pictures, get test STD results, provide physical security for them, verify the identities of their clients, collect payment, provide insurance, and publish an Android app to promote this? And you're going to do it all through Tor because, of course, you need to be anonymous? That is very convenient considering that you're doing a token sale! I have to say, if I were totally anonymous and my ICO went well I'd probably renege on the whole thing. After all, why would I put myself in serious legal jeopardy by running a form of darknet market when I could just pocket the investors money secure in the knowledge that nobody will feel sorry for them?

the_stc 9y ago
Almost: At first the app will be a PWA so that users can use iOS. But yes, the provider side will eventually end up as Android-only app. These are not really tokens, they are dividend-generating shares that will optionally be recorded via ERC20 tokens. We are using the term ICO only because saying IPO or Blockchain IPO tended to confuse people. We want to raise secondary rounds to really expand, and screwing Series A investors sounds like the worst way to achieve that goal.