3 ms·
I don't really think there's any call for such an objectification of women. The joke would have been just fine without it.
by dwringer 9y ago
I don't really think there's any call for such an objectification of women. The joke would have been just fine without it.
- blunte 9y agoIt wasn't objectification of women, it was a reference to a Bourne (movie series) continuation.
- dwringer 9y agoI'm not sure how to respond to this. I can't tell if you read both sentences of my previous comment. My point was that the Bourne reference would have been funny without the objectification of women by the inclusion of the phrase "and slightly-above-average women" in the comment at the top of the thread.
- finallyposting 9y agoHmmm... reaperducer made a joke that pointed out that the objectification of women was a part of the toxic masculinity tropes of the Bourne movies... which is pretty woke. But then dwringer assumed bad faith about an (assumed) cis white male, that mentioning the trope was in earnest instead of part of a put on (or alternatively that such objectification is above being joked about). In my opinion that's woker. I'll let others in the thread decide, but I'm investing my nice guy points in dwringer.