4 ms·
I would add a seemingly expensive solution to this non-existant problem. It may kind of makes sense for heroku because afaik they don't offer redis support out
by mgrouchy 16y ago
I would add a seemingly expensive solution to this non-existant problem. It may kind of makes sense for heroku because afaik they don't offer redis support out of the box.
- jackowayed 16y agoYeah, I would definitely consider using the $25 plan with Heroku. The only other real option is to run Redis on its own EC2 instance, which costs $62 minimum (well, once you're sure the thing's sticking around, you could make it a reserved instance I guess). Now, that's a lot more powerful, but if I'm using something that doesn't even need the 100MB of RAM, I might as well save some money and use Redis to Go. Plus you get the added bonus of still not having to worry about any piece of your infrastructure.