The interesting split is to see when something is called "ideologically" driven versus something merely painted as the act of a "crazed" person. Indeed. It's i

The interesting split is to see when something is called "ideologically" driven versus something merely painted as the act of a "crazed" person. Indeed. It's interesting to see how people's framing of a topic sometimes communicates more than an answer to direct questioning could. This calls to mind another split where wealth is the cushion: When the poor are deemed crazy but the rich merely eccentric for perpetuating similar, negatively perceived actions.