2 ms·
But are they 10x better, for the price? I listen to music. You mentioned the quality was poor. I won't compromise quality for cables, and cordless is a bit of a
by OtterCoder 9y ago
But are they 10x better, for the price? I listen to music. You mentioned the quality was poor. I won't compromise quality for cables, and cordless is a bit of a non-benefit to me.
- dyarosla 9y agoYou seem to forget you can still have wired headphones connected through the USB c port. It's just the standard jack that's gone. It's not wireless or jack as the only options. Personally I've loathed wired for almost 8years now. I was happy when they removed the jack, and kept, in my mind, still an alternative if you really want to stay wired sometimes.
- mixedCase 9y ago> You seem to forget you can still have wired headphones connected through the USB c port. I already went through the adapter shit with my Sony Ericsson Walkman dumbphones 10 years ago. We have moved on. I refuse to technologically regress to that point because Apple wants to milk people with a new fashion accessory and the other manufacturers want to "look cool" imitating that idiocy.
- arethuza 9y agoWell, cordless is a benefit for me and they have a richer set of remote controls (pause/play, forward/reverse, volume up down) than the cabled headphones I've used. They sound worse than the £300 noise cancelling cabled headphones I've also got - in absolute terms I think they are pretty decent. I wasn't expecting to be a convert - but now that I've used the wireless headphones for a few months with my iPhone 7 I'm a convert!