3 ms·
It's been done, but they ran into trouble with New Jersey for a bit. https://www.eff.org/cases/rubin-v-new-jersey-tidbit https://www.eff.org/cases/rubin-v-new-
by Cursuviam 9y ago
It's been done, but they ran into trouble with New Jersey for a bit.
https://www.eff.org/cases/rubin-v-new-jersey-tidbit https://www.eff.org/cases/rubin-v-new-jersey-tidbit
- jasonkostempski 9y ago"And the state itself echoed the comments of Judge Furnari, noting in its press release announcing the consent order "we do not believe Tidbit was created for the purpose of invading privacy."" What about every other ad network in existence? They are specifically designed to invade privacy. Why isn't NJ going after them?
- DamonHD 9y agoMaybe this is a "whoosh" but (legit) ad networks are specifically designed to sell ads (and thus make the network owners some money); it is hyperbole to claim that each and every one of them has only an ulterior/illegal motive in place of the stated (unpopular one).