5 ms·
One third of Americans are headed for diabetes
- melling 9y ago“A simple blood test can detect prediabetes, a condition marked by higher-than-normal blood sugar” Why do you need a prescription in the US to get a blood test? I tried to get a follow up to a test that I got at a local health fair, but I couldn’t do it without a prescription, even if I would pay out of pocket. Wouldn’t it be useful for people to monitor some basic numbers on a regular basis without visiting a doctor?
- SQL2219 9y agohttps://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss_2?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=aic+test https://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss_2?url=search-alias%3...
- melling 9y agoI wasn’t speaking about blood glucose levels specifically. I had another number that was marked as slightly high. That’s why I said blood tests.
- phonon 9y agoYou can in Arizona. Theranos sponsored the legislation. https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2015/07/02/new-arizona-law-and-fda-approval-gives-theranos-something-to-celebrate/29634373/ https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2015/07/02/new-arizona-l...
- wil421 9y agoI get a health check yearly at work that test for all sorts of things including fasting blood sugar. No prescription required and I'm in the US.
- DrScump 9y agoWhy do you need a prescription in the US to get a blood test? You don't.
- melling 9y agoAnd how do you do it? The snarky “you don’t” isn’t very helpful. Do you live in Arizona where someone mentioned they have new legislation? https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2015/07/02/new-arizona-law-and-fda-approval-gives-theranos-something-to-celebrate/29634373/ https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2015/07/02/new-arizona-l...
- DrScump 9y agoYour snarky implication that a prescription was needed for any blood test in the USA was factually incorrect. I know of no state that has such a blanket requirement.
- 0xcde4c3db 9y ago> The primary risk factor for type 2 diabetes is genetics, but excess weight, obesity and lack of exercise also contribute to this alarming medical trend. How does genetics compare to age as a risk factor? The article touches on age later (even saying that the risk rises exponentially after 65), but doesn't give hard numbers, and I've had a hard time finding any that seem both relevant and credible. The closest I could find was a summary of a CDC report [1] (edit: actually the source for this article; I didn't see the link before) that found 4% prevalence of diabetes in the 14-44 age group, 17% in 45-64, and 25% in 65+. If genetics is an even bigger risk factor than that, it seems like it's a huge factor. [1] https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2017/p0718-diabetes-report.html https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2017/p0718-diabetes-repor...
- georgepeterson 9y agodiabetes.... the new lung cancer