3 ms·
>I see it repeated a lot that think tanks are really propaganda engines with an intellectual veneer, but can you back that up with specific examples? You mean
by Clubber 9y ago
>I see it repeated a lot that think tanks are really propaganda engines with an intellectual veneer, but can you back that up with specific examples?
You mean other than the article we are replying to? :)
All joking aside, I'm sure all think tanks aren't shilling with every article, but follow the money. They are typically founded by, actively solicit and are paid for by corporate donations and corporations don't typically give money for nothing.
Cato is a libertarian think tank. They have a specific libertarian slant. The print more articles that libertarians would like and print fewer articles that libertarians don't, specifically Koch flavored libertarian-ism. I mean that's the way it just is. I mean I favor social libertarian-ism, but for someone to be an objective reader, they need to know that Cato was formed to serve libertarian interests.
- grasshopperpurp 9y agoRemember the Koch's 2012 takeover: The Koch brothers have long supported Cato, which they helped found in Washington in 1977. Recently, however, they have come to consider their creation politically unreliable. In a meeting with Robert Levy, chairman of Cato’s board of directors, they expressed their intention to remake the institute into a party organ that would aid their effort to unseat President Obama. To do so, however, they need control of the board. They intend to get it by suing the widow of William Niskanen, a recently deceased board member, for control of Niskanen’s shares. https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/post/why-would-the-koch-brothers-want-to-refine-cato-institute/2012/03/09/gIQAxKWe1R_blog.html?utm_term=.61dda0d507c9 https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/post/why-wou...
- arcbyte 9y agoPointing to Ezra Klein to explain what is happening on the right is the opposite of "slant-free".
- tptacek 9y agoHe's not "pointing to Ezra Klein to explain"; he's citing reporting. If some part of it is false, correct it.
- chillwaves 9y agoIn the age of the internet, shooting the messenger is not an effective way to suppress the message.
- Clubber 9y agoMost of the time it is. Look at how they character assassinated Snowden. They said his girlfriend was a stripper, he was a Russian spy, etc. Your first impression might be to say that wasn't effective, but did we ever get any real NSA reform? Nope. But to your point, the message still got out, but many people allowed themselves to ignore it.