2 ms·
This was on reddit a couple of days ago and the thread was full of examples of bland logos that scored really well and good or notable logos that scored very po
by eps 9y ago
This was on reddit a couple of days ago and the thread was full of examples of bland logos that scored really well and good or notable logos that scored very poorly.
I wouldn't take this neural net output too seriously.
The training size is 1 mil logos - that alone makes one wonder how this mil was ranked in the first place to separate good logos from the junk that is bound to comprise a pool of logos that huge.
- Jack000 9y agoif the tool told you something you already knew - that notable logos are good, what would be the point? maybe there's more value in discussing why the algorithm thinks bland logos score higher than the notable ones.