when i read it, the implication i got was that the accused gets perverse pleasure from watching corporations defile civil liberties. like, if he called him a d

when i read it, the implication i got was that the accused gets perverse pleasure from watching corporations defile civil liberties. like, if he called him a douche, i'd assume it was to say he doesn't care about his obligations to the american people and is only interested in helping his rich buddies... not that the prankster was too lazy to come up with anything other than a gross and generic comparison to female hygiene.