3 ms·
maybe that image really is a better logo than nike :] - on a uniqueness front there are a lot of swooshes, peppers and moustaches that look sort of similar to
by Jack000 9y ago
maybe that image really is a better logo than nike :]
- on a uniqueness front there are a lot of swooshes, peppers and moustaches that look sort of similar to nike, whereas that image is guaranteed to not have been used for any icon or logo, ever.
- both are fairly legible
- the meme is certainly more colorful and eye-catching
the neural net doesn't really judge the aesthetics of a logo, and it doesn't have any idea what the content of the image is. It just impassively gives you a score based on the similarity to thenounproject icons and a few other parameters.
- rsoto 9y agoAs I said, I'm not complaining, so don't take it wrong. But that's not a «logo rank», that's an image evaluation. What it should do first is figure out whether it looks like a logo, or not; if it's a simple shape, with few colors, it might be a logo (yes, there are logos with complicated shapes and a lot of colors—the algorithm should decrement its score based on this criteria). My point is that your tool is very cool, I wish I could do something like that—but that's not a «logo rank», it's a «how unique, legible and eye-catching the image you upload is» rank.