On second thought, you're right. The statment is wrong on my part. Systemd seems to have pleased the Arch developers and made their lives easier. I was trying

On second thought, you're right. The statment is wrong on my part. Systemd seems to have pleased the Arch developers and made their lives easier. I was trying to say: Void seems easier to use and stable. Thanks for pointing this out. Sorry for my carelessness. (I still would never use a systemd-based distro. I've had fewer problems since leaving it. And I've read too many horror stories to go back. And I suspect it led to many if the problems I had installing and booting. Void has a smaller community than Arch and Ubuntu, yet installs and biots up faster on my junky machines than Arch and Ubuntu. Granted, I can't blame systemd for this.... but I'll include it anyway in the lineup of suspects.)