3 ms·
It's nice, but for rock-bottom low-friction signup and easy (Markdown-based) formatting you might want to consider emulating jottit.com. It's also possibly wor
by jcdreads 19y ago
It's nice, but for rock-bottom low-friction signup and easy (Markdown-based) formatting you might want to consider emulating jottit.com.
It's also possibly worthwhile to add a "dump entire site as a bunch of text" button; to bring people back, send them away, or whatever the aphorism is.
Nice demo.
- drusenko 19y agoAre you kidding? jottit is "nice" in that you can "start using it" right away, but you're slamming users up against the empty form wall in full force. Upon arriving at jottit.com, I don't know what jottit does at all, and I certainly don't know what to put in the damn box.
- jcdreads 19y agoRight. As I said, and for exactly the reasons you state, the only aspects of jottit.com I'd recommend emulating are the fast (lazy) signup and the ability to type Markdown text instead of using raw HTML or a heavy rich text widget. (And while I happen to think jottit is cute, note that I had reserved the ornate and completely pretentious praise of "nice" for orgu. :)