2 ms·

Also, an unreliable narrator.

• FooHentai 9y ago
  Hmm, I think this comment was taken little more negatively than I had intended. My fault of course for not expanding on the point, which is this: Satoshi maintains anonymity, by choice. Therefore, any information about Satoshi's identity, directly stated or inferred from things said by them, logically have to be treated as unreliable. With the goal of remaining anonymous, Satoshi has nothing to gain and a lot to lose from providing true information about themselves. It is in their interest to not provide any information about themselves, and for any information that is provided them be inaccurate. None of this casts any aspersions on either Bitcoin or Satoshi. Ah heck, I sound like Vizzini. Maybe I should just drink the damn wine ;)