3 ms·
This is not new and if your backup system does not comply with regulations, it's probably more of a design problem. Perhaps, but it's a design problem that app
by Silhouette 9y ago
This is not new and if your backup system does not comply with regulations, it's probably more of a design problem.
Perhaps, but it's a design problem that approximately 100% of otherwise reasonable backup systems will have, and working around it comprehensively will be extraordinarily expensive.
Do we really want to impose rules that incentivize businesses storing personal data on behalf of their customers not to back that data up properly, in order to avoid any potential liability under the GDPR? Because that's exactly what this law does, as it stands.
- cm2187 9y agoIt feels like the reaction of a VW engineer complaining that CO2 emissions regulations are making his job complicated. Yeah, if you want the data, you need to be able to handle the data in a compliant way. The other solution is to not collect the data. Keep in mind that this is targeted at user tracking. Don't expect me to be sympathetic to the troubles of backing up all of that tracking data.
- Silhouette 9y agoYeah, if you want the data, you need to be able to handle the data in a compliant way. The other solution is to not collect the data. But since that data will include things like routine server logs, back-ups of customer records necessary for statutory financial record-keeping purposes, and so on, it's never that easy. With such a broadly written law, you could spend a small fortune on legal advice just to find out what your real, practical obligations are to make a good faith attempt to comply. Keep in mind that this is targeted at user tracking. The intent might have been to go after user tracking, but unfortunately, that's not what the law they made actually says.