6 ms·
File under: terrible ideas made possible by buzzwords.
by 659087 9y ago
File under: terrible ideas made possible by buzzwords.
- dang 9y agoWould you please stop posting unsubstantive comments to HN?
- 659087 9y agoI see what I'd consider "unsubstantive" comments left alone on HN in pretty much every thread, so if you could, please define "unsubstantive".
- omarchowdhury 9y agoIn this specific case you call Lisk a terrible idea without substantiating why, other than the fact that's its related to a nascent technology (buzzword as you say).
- dang 9y agoModeration works by random sample so it obviously isn't going to be consistent. But if you post like that repeatedly, you're eventually going to get asked not to. Whatever the definition of unsubstantive is, snarky generic dismissals are certainly included.
- retox 9y agoIs there an option to disable this auto-collapsing?
- omarchowdhury 9y agoThere was a time when common internet protocols we take for granted today were a buzzword, too. Buzzwords are buzzwords until implementation is (or isn't) proven useful. Lisk is making an attempt. Let's judge the attempt and the fruits or lack thereof. Disclaimer: I am not an investor, stakeholder, or employee in Lisk.
- 659087 9y agoI'm not calling blockchains a buzzword as a derogatory term towards blockchains. I'm more using the term to point out the way blockchains are being used right now (e.g. marketing bad ideas and non-ideas as groundbreaking tech). That's not to say there aren't plenty of promising projects out there. There absolutely are.
- omarchowdhury 9y agoWhich blockchain projects do you see as promising?
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]