2 ms·
Er... I'm not sure why anyone would believe that monopoly could provide a lower price. The only problem a monopoly solves is whether the good or service is to
by logfromblammo 9y ago
Er... I'm not sure why anyone would believe that monopoly could provide a lower price. The only problem a monopoly solves is whether the good or service is to be continuously available in the market or not.
You might allow a monopoly if the alternative is periods of competition interleaved with periods where there are no firms left in the market at all. If you choose to grant a monopoly, prices will be higher, and supply more constrained, but the good or service will always be available to the highest bidders. You're never going to get a lower price out of one, unless the owners are impossibly altruistic.
- alexanderstears 9y agoMany people think a monopolist could provide the lowest possible prices. However, anyone who thinks a monopolist would provide the most consumer surplus has an opinion that's at odds with the consensus.
- logfromblammo 9y agoWow. That's a really polite and diplomatic way to describe "completely crazy". I might just re-use that wording myself.