3 ms·
That’s a weak-ass article you’ve cited there which does little more than make some vague accusations with little evidence. Frankly this looks more like a typic
by matthewmacleod 9y ago
That’s a weak-ass article you’ve cited there which does little more than make some vague accusations with little evidence.
Frankly this looks more like a typical case of a celebrity endorsement without enough research - which is bad, but I’d argue far less serious than the accusations you’re making.
- jacobolus 9y agoThis author’s every post is vacuous clickbait for angry right-wingers, https://thefederalist.com/author/danielpayne/ https://thefederalist.com/author/danielpayne/ “Trump Spoke Truth About ‘Both Sides’ In Charlottesville, And The Media Lost Their Minds” “If We’re Tearing Down White Supremacy, Start With Planned Parenthood” “If Google Fires Anyone Over Stereotyping, It Should Be The Employees Who Stayed Home To Cry Over A Memo” “Dear Climate Alarmists: Now That The Paris Accord Is Settled, Please Go Away” etc.
- matt_wulfeck 9y agoYou're totally right. It's a bad link and I regret including it.
- csomar 9y agoPlease no ad-hominem. You should only discuss his article in question.