3 ms·
I use full disk encryption, so I don't care about the encryption feature. But if this is going to be faster than borg for backing up data and deduplication beca
by feld 9y ago
I use full disk encryption, so I don't care about the encryption feature. But if this is going to be faster than borg for backing up data and deduplication because it's in Go and not in Python I will gladly switch.
- dom0 9y agoFrom the benchmarks I've seen so far, there is no efficient (in terms of CPU use) deduplicating archiver. Sometimes restic is faster, sometimes Borg, no really clear picture. Compression can make Borg faster as well, when it fits the data set (LZ4 can be fast enough and compress well enough to reduce overall processing time, not just storage requirements).
- feld 9y agoI use ZFS compression so I don't use borg's native compression either. I'm currently using lz4 but I will soon be moving to zstd which will gain me even more performance with similar or better compression.