3 ms·
It would be cool if mozilla and google would standatalize the headless API and command line flags as llvm and gcc has done, so you would perform headless cross
by bligh____ 9y ago
It would be cool if mozilla and google would standatalize the headless API and command line flags as llvm and gcc has done, so you would perform headless cross browser testing.
- cat199 9y agoFWIW, the most common cc command line flags on unix share a common lineage back to AT&T PCC compiler. Which is not to say there is not common effort between the projects you mention now.
- XCSme 9y agoSo something like Webdriver.io ?
- jacalata 9y agoLike that, but with documentation.
- shados 9y agoand that actually works. Using headless chrome with the direct API is so much more reliable than the selenium API.
- Lightbody 9y agoThe onus of who actually automates the browser is moving from Selenium (the open source project) to the browser vendors. This will help with reliability and is also exactly what you're asking for: https://www.w3.org/TR/webdriver/ https://www.w3.org/TR/webdriver/
- shados 9y agoRight. That will be nice when it's done and stable (I'm looking at you, Safari), but for my tests today that doesn't really help me.
- wgjordan 9y agoI would be very interested in tracking the details you're hinting at to know when this is done and stable to use reliably. Do you have specific examples/issues related to what your tests today require that is unreliable / not currently possible using WebDriver with Safari and/or headless Chrome?