6 ms·
I have to agree, the fact that this is a WSJ article makes me curious about the possibility that this is a Toyota-paid-for damage control article. Especially du
by workingsmart 16y ago
I have to agree, the fact that this is a WSJ article makes me curious about the possibility that this is a Toyota-paid-for damage control article. Especially due to the FRBNY/WSJ editing scandal exposed by ZeroHedge last week. I expect this is a PR attempt by Toyota to discredit the lawsuits in the eyes of the general public and counter their dropping sales figures.
Unless this diagnostic system is completely separate from the drive-by-wire system, this isn't pertinent information.
- maukdaddy 16y agoIf you think the WSJ would try to cover up something for Toyota you're an idiot. This isn't some second-class blog we're talking about - it's WSJ.
- workingsmart 16y agoI'm new to hackernews and I thought maybe you people were as respectful as your mission statement suggests. This is Ad-hominem.
- thaumaturgy 16y agoIt's not ad-hominem, because he didn't say you were wrong because you're an idiot; he said you're an idiot because you're wrong. ;-) Conspiracy theories aren't very popular here, unless they involve those pesky climate scientists.
- workingsmart 16y agoIf you're here on HN to learn new things, you should read this article from ZeroHedge, about the WSJ and the way it panders to power and money. http://www.zerohedge.com/article/new-york-feds-editorial-influence-over-wsj#new http://www.zerohedge.com/article/new-york-feds-editorial-inf...