5 ms·
Don't want to because it hurts your pride, or don't want to because it has a practical impact on your ability to compete in your actual market? Amazon/AWS is n
by stupidcar 9y ago
Don't want to because it hurts your pride, or don't want to because it has a practical impact on your ability to compete in your actual market?
Amazon/AWS is not going to fail because Target took away their business. But Target could easily screw up transitioning to another provider, and end up paying a lot in terms of money and wasted effort. Money and effort that would have been better spent improving their core business. Target should concentrate on build a better retail business than Amazon, not worrying about whether that business is built on top of AWS or some other cloud provider.
It's like how Apple compete with Samsung in the smartphone market, but still relies on Samsung as a central component supplier for many of their devices. I'm sure Apple execs would prefer not to give Samsung any money, but they're also smart enough to realise that using only non-Samsung suppliers simply for the sake of it would ultimately be a self-defeating move.
- meric 9y agoAmazon could also cut service to Target and it could take months for Target to react properly through the courts.
- abraae 9y agoBut when they eventually did, and proved that AWS had... targeted them.. then the financial penalties and the loss of confidence would cause enormous harm to AWS. Which is why AWS would never do this in the first place.
- nickpeterson 9y agoImagine the field day Microsoft's Azure Marketing team would have with that revelation....
- ohrearry 9y agoDo you by chance work for Volkswagen?
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]