> What the article claims is that 192KHz is useless, of no benefit. The article claims that 192KHz downloads are of no benefit. It's right there in the article

> What the article claims is that 192KHz is useless, of no benefit. The article claims that 192KHz downloads are of no benefit. It's right there in the article's title. It's difficult to not accuse you of willfully misinterpreting his argument.