3 ms·
So by induction, you need to learn N - 2, N - 3, ..., 2, ... 1? I wholeheartedly disagree. By that logic, why stop at transistors? Let's get down to the physics
by vecter 16y ago
So by induction, you need to learn N - 2, N - 3, ..., 2, ... 1? I wholeheartedly disagree. By that logic, why stop at transistors? Let's get down to the physics of how transistors work, or hey, atomic physics.
- Groxx 16y agoEhhh... only partially. If you need to work well at level N-1, then yes, the inductive proof works. They only mentioned knowledge about a level lower than you're working at, though.
- vecter 16y agoMy bad, I read it wrong.
- scott_s 16y agoI said "a good conceptual understanding." Not a complete understanding.
- dfox 16y agoActually in case of transistors, it is better to understand how they really work on physics level, because many abstract models of transistor do not make sense.