>It's only feature is on-chain voting on protocol changes >It also assumes hard forks are always bad and that everything can be agreed upon with votes Those t

>It's only feature is on-chain voting on protocol changes >It also assumes hard forks are always bad and that everything can be agreed upon with votes Those two statements are incorrect. If you want to understand what it brings to the table, then you should read the position paper: https://www.tezos.com/static/papers/position_paper.pdf https://www.tezos.com/static/papers/position_paper.pdf Or watch a presentation by the lead about Governance: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6OWxGqbknFQ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6OWxGqbknFQ