3 ms·
The CE version is open source. I would argue that the gut feeling would be that it gets fixed faster than the enterprise version. Maybe not deployed as fast t
by dudul 9y ago
The CE version is open source. I would argue that the gut feeling would be that it gets fixed faster than the enterprise version. Maybe not deployed as fast though.
Anyway, I would just go with GitLab regardless. It is more of a turn key solution than GitHub. You can set up automatic builds, use project management tools, etc.
- apetresc 9y agoLooking at the commits for GitLab CE, I can't really find a single recent contribution by someone not employed by GitLab. So I doubt it "gets fixed faster" than the enterprise version.
- blackst0ne 9y agoActually there are many community contributions. E.g. for 9.5 it's 82 merged MRs from the community. https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests?scope=all&utf8=%E2%9C%93&state=merged&label_name[]=Community%20Contribution&milestone_title=9.5 https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests?scope...
- petecooper 9y ago>The CE version is open source. I would argue that the gut feeling would be that it gets fixed faster than the enterprise version. Maybe not deployed as fast though. I should clarify: I was referring to infrastructure issues rather than code quality. If servers go offline, I'm assuming the paying clients have a higher-grade SLA to no-cost clients, even if it's a few hours different.