4 ms·
The DeepL version indeed makes more sense, but still has several things a human translator would probably do differently. Still very impressive. (Unfortunately
by Sujan 9y ago
The DeepL version indeed makes more sense, but still has several things a human translator would probably do differently. Still very impressive.
(Unfortunately EN->DE translations from DeepL are not on the same level - yet -, at least not on the stuff I just put in.)