5 ms·

According to German and Italian Tech News, the translations produced by the neural network are better than Google Translate and Microsoft Translator: https://w

• Double_a_92 9y ago
  Tried it myself. Can confirm that it's extremely impressive!
• gabeytani 9y ago
  Just tried with the golem.de article: Google Translate: > Better than Google and Microsoft - the German company DeepL is committed to translation services. DeepL uses a novel architecture of neural networks and uses a supercomputer with 5.1 petaflops. By the same company, the service comes Linguee who has already made with translations of individual words or phrases a name. Texts translated by humans are used for translations in order to provide better results. DeepL: > Better than Google and Microsoft - this is the goal that DeepL, a German company, has set itself, at least for translation services. DeepL uses a novel architecture of neural networks and relies on a supercomputer with 5.1 petaflops. The Linguee service, which has already made a name for itself with translations of individual words or groups of words, comes from the same company. In doing so, human-translated texts are used for translations in order to deliver better results. I think the DeepL version makes more sense here, but I am not a German reader so I might be off.
  • Sujan 9y ago
    The DeepL version indeed makes more sense, but still has several things a human translator would probably do differently. Still very impressive. (Unfortunately EN->DE translations from DeepL are not on the same level - yet -, at least not on the stuff I just put in.)
  • ma2rten 9y ago
    That's also first thing I tired, ... Looks like people are more predicable than we think. If I was them i would make sure that I do a good job on that.
  • supermdguy 9y ago
    Deepl is much better than Google translate. I could almost imagine reading its translation, and not noticing anything.