3 ms·
The site's main idea seems to hinge on a very narrow definition of "porn". It offers sex video clips intended to arouse the audience -- I'm not sure what else t
by pluma 9y ago
The site's main idea seems to hinge on a very narrow definition of "porn". It offers sex video clips intended to arouse the audience -- I'm not sure what else to call that but pornographic.
It tries to keep a niche focus on "realistic" content produced by amateurs but considering most real sex doesn't translate well to video, I'm guessing it'll eventually be either just another low-quality amateur clip site or sacrifice authenticity for production quality and become a generic "for women" porn site.
For context, here is what distinguishes "porn" from "real sex" according to the website (obviously this list is not intended to be exhaustive):
* coming on women's faces
* no "hair down there"
* no foreplay
* no clitoral stimulation
* all women love anal
* dirty talk
I'm willing to wager creating porn without these qualifiers isn't a novel idea and that there are already existing websites offering that. None of these seem necessary or sufficient to distinguish between porn and "real sex" videos.